FORENSIC NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL & PSYCHOLOGICAL services
Neuropsychological Evaluations
Psychological Evaluations
Expert Witness Services
Consulting Expert Services
Forensic Neuropsychological & Psychological Evaluations
Comprehensive forensic neuropsychological and psychological evaluations provide objective, data-driven findings for litigation and other high-stakes decisions. Each evaluation considers the full range of factors that may contribute to a person’s presentation, including medical and psychosocial history, brain injury and other neuromedical conditions, emotional factors, chronic pain, and the validity of reported symptoms and test performance.
These assessments help judges, juries, attorneys, and other decision makers evaluate questions in personal injury litigation, workers’ compensation claims, competency to proceed, mental state at the time of the offense (criminal responsibility), and risk of violence. Referrals are accepted from plaintiff and defense counsel, courts, and agencies.
Located in Jacksonville and serving cases statewide, with evaluations available in Tampa, Orlando, Miami, Tallahassee, and other Florida cities.
Expert Witness Services
As a testifying expert, Dr. Gross provides independent, objective opinions on neuropsychological and psychological questions in civil and criminal matters. Services include forensic evaluation, record review, and testimony at deposition, trial, and hearings. Opinions are grounded in the data, the scientific literature, and professional standards, and are communicated in plain language that judges and juries can follow.
Testimony may address the validity and interpretation of prior assessments, including test selection, normative data, performance and symptom validity, and whether conclusions are supported by the evidence.
Consulting Expert Services
As a consulting expert, Dr. Gross works with counsel to help them understand neuropsychological and psychological evidence. Consultation may include reviewing records and opposing expert reports, identifying strengths and weaknesses in testing and interpretation, explaining technical issues, and helping counsel prepare for depositions and cross-examination of other experts.
